Friday, November 13, 2009

Genius

I love Ted Talks (www.ted.com).  Anyone out there know of them?  They get really smart people to give really smart talks about all manner of things and there are a million of them and they are free!

So I was listening to this one (about creativity and whether artists "are" geniuses or "have" geniuses) today and I highly recommend it, especially if you are a person who does any kind of work in the arts. 





I think what Elizabeth Gilbert is talking about here pertains to anyone who does work that involves inspiration and creativity (which, frankly is most fields) but artists in particular are very susceptible to the idea that the creation, or lack thereof, is all on them. That one can achieve transcendence only to have it disappear perhaps never to return.  And the pressure of that need to keep achieving is a killing feeling.  What if we, the creator, aren't the only one in the mix?

I know that the spiritual nay-sayers will pooh pooh the idea of some outside force or entity or daemon rushing through us and gifting us with words, song, movement etc, that all of it is good old fashioned neurology mingled with hard work, but I guess I'm not so sure.  I do not believe in the great father sky god, that's for sure. But I've had enough moments of wonder with writing, or performing watching someone perform where I think transcendence is something....in us but not of us.  Outside of use or surrounding us while at once sparking from deep inside.  Ms. Gilbert's retelling of an interview with poet Ruth Stone, was particularly moving to me.

All I know is, there is the universe seems to be made of music, and we can all hear it once and awhile. What we do with it is up to us.

3 comments:

Bachelor Girl said...

Oh, honey. Art and creativity are totally supernatural, and no one will ever be able to convince me otherwise.

thedoggedpursuit said...

Ted is my "favorite waste of time" (also a great Bette Middler tune!)

I think this is a beautiful example of why myth and legend are so crucial to knowing ourselves. Just like our ancestors, our world is still a mystery and we are simply less ignorant, not necessarily smarter, than they were. Our stories -- those that we tell each other as well as those that we tell ourselves -- help us make sense of things. It's entirely possible and most likely probable that there is a "logical" explanation for how the creative brain works. Currently though, we don't know what the fuck that is, but we still have to deal with it's downside and embrace the upside. What's wrong with envisioning your creative force as a daemon or a genious or a muse if that's what works for you and keeps you sane?

I also like that Elizabeth identified her creative process as a mule :) In my artistic endeavors, that's kind of how I see myself as well. I would love to be the graceful and celebrated throroughbred, but that doesn't seem to be my role so far.

All the best!

Shaktiforce said...

I am of the firm experience, (not belief) that there is Grace that flows through us in our more creative moments!

Post a Comment